Israel-founded (2016) CFD proprietary trading challenge firm — also styled 'The5%ers' — one of the longer-running firms in the category, with a 4.7/5 Trustpilot score across 36,634 reviews (90% five-star) and a 96% reply rate to negative reviews. Runs four CFD evaluation programs (Bootcamp, High Stakes, Hyper Growth, Pro Growth) all sharing a genuinely trader-friendly trait — static, not trailing, drawdown across every program — plus a separate futures arm. Real caveats: a February 2024 suspension of new US CFD traders with no confirmed lift found, a High Stakes evaluation-fee refund that is 70% (not the commonly assumed 100%), and a documented pattern of large-payout account-termination disputes citing vague 'account integrity' language.
Source: The5ers — Challenge Programs Explained (Bootcamp / High Stakes / Hyper Growth / Pro Growth) · last checked Sep 2, 2026 · confidence Medium
Source: The5ers — Challenge Programs Explained (Bootcamp / High Stakes / Hyper Growth / Pro Growth) · last checked Sep 2, 2026 · confidence Medium
Source: The5ers — Challenge Programs Explained (Bootcamp / High Stakes / Hyper Growth / Pro Growth) · last checked Sep 2, 2026 · confidence Medium
Source: The5ers — Challenge Programs Explained (Bootcamp / High Stakes / Hyper Growth / Pro Growth) · last checked Sep 2, 2026 · confidence Medium
Source: The5ers — Challenge Programs Explained (Bootcamp / High Stakes / Hyper Growth / Pro Growth) · last checked Sep 2, 2026 · confidence Medium
Drawdown type decides whether a winning day raises the level you can be cut at.
Source: The5ers — Challenge Programs Explained (Bootcamp / High Stakes / Hyper Growth / Pro Growth) · last checked Sep 2, 2026 · confidence Medium
Source: The5ers — Challenge Programs Explained (Bootcamp / High Stakes / Hyper Growth / Pro Growth) · last checked Sep 2, 2026 · confidence Medium
Source: The5ers — Challenge Programs Explained (Bootcamp / High Stakes / Hyper Growth / Pro Growth) · last checked Sep 2, 2026 · confidence Medium
Source: The5ers — Challenge Programs Explained (Bootcamp / High Stakes / Hyper Growth / Pro Growth) · last checked Sep 2, 2026 · confidence Medium
Source: The5ers — Challenge Programs Explained (Bootcamp / High Stakes / Hyper Growth / Pro Growth) · last checked Sep 2, 2026 · confidence Medium
Source: The5ers — Challenge Programs Explained (Bootcamp / High Stakes / Hyper Growth / Pro Growth) · last checked Sep 2, 2026 · confidence Medium
Source: The5ers — Challenge Programs Explained (Bootcamp / High Stakes / Hyper Growth / Pro Growth) · last checked Sep 2, 2026 · confidence Medium
Source: The5ers — Challenge Programs Explained (Bootcamp / High Stakes / Hyper Growth / Pro Growth) · last checked Sep 2, 2026 · confidence Medium
Source: The5ers — Challenge Programs Explained (Bootcamp / High Stakes / Hyper Growth / Pro Growth) · last checked Sep 2, 2026 · confidence Medium
A rule that is absent from this list is not automatically permitted — it means we have no sourced statement either way.
Source: The5ers — Challenge Programs Explained (Bootcamp / High Stakes / Hyper Growth / Pro Growth) · last checked Sep 2, 2026 · confidence Medium
Source: The5ers — Challenge Programs Explained (Bootcamp / High Stakes / Hyper Growth / Pro Growth) · last checked Sep 2, 2026 · confidence Medium
Source: The5ers — Challenge Programs Explained (Bootcamp / High Stakes / Hyper Growth / Pro Growth) · last checked Sep 2, 2026 · confidence Medium
Source: The5ers — Challenge Programs Explained (Bootcamp / High Stakes / Hyper Growth / Pro Growth) · last checked Sep 2, 2026 · confidence Medium
Source: The5ers — Challenge Programs Explained (Bootcamp / High Stakes / Hyper Growth / Pro Growth) · last checked Sep 2, 2026 · confidence Medium
Source: The5ers — Challenge Programs Explained (Bootcamp / High Stakes / Hyper Growth / Pro Growth) · last checked Sep 2, 2026 · confidence Medium
Source: The5ers — Challenge Programs Explained (Bootcamp / High Stakes / Hyper Growth / Pro Growth) · last checked Sep 2, 2026 · confidence Medium
Each dimension is scored 0–100 with a written rationale and its own weight. No single unexplained star.
The5ers documents its programs in real detail across a dedicated blog explainer and specific help-center FAQs (prohibited-practices list, EA source-code-ownership rule), and — unusually for the sector — announces price changes as a direct, dated public statement (the Jan 2025 price notice) rather than silently editing a page. Marked down because an automated fetch of the live High Stakes pricing table returned an internally inconsistent flat '$19' figure across every account size, and the page's own account-size lineup (2.5k–100k, scaling to 500k) doesn't cleanly match the size/price lineup independently corroborated elsewhere (5k/20k/60k/100k, scaling toward 4M) — a trader relying on the live page alone could come away with a materially wrong picture of cost.
The genuine standout: every program — High Stakes, Hyper Growth, Pro Growth, Bootcamp — uses static (balance-based) drawdown, with no trailing/equity-ratchet variant hidden behind an 'instant funding' brand the way some competitors do. Hyper Growth even turns a daily-loss breach into a one-day pause rather than an account-ending event, which is unusually forgiving. High Stakes' 5%/10% daily/max thresholds are standard-for-the-industry, not generous, but the consistent no-trailing-anywhere policy is a real structural fairness advantage over firms that mix drawdown types across their own product line.
Concrete, checkable mechanics: 14-day first payout, 14-day cycles after that, a $150 minimum and a 72-hour processing window (secondary-sourced, since the primary help page 404'd — flagged for re-check). No review-manipulation finding turned up against The5ers the way one did for a peer firm, and the firm replies to 96% of negative Trustpilot reviews — genuinely better transparency behavior than most of the sector. Marked down for a real, if secondary-sourced, pattern of large-payout account-termination disputes (a $15,800 rejected payout citing vague 'account integrity and exclusive ownership issues' with no detailed evidence offered, and a separate report of a scaled account's accrued profit being zeroed after a support dispute) — both found only via search-snippet corroboration of Forex Peace Army content that returned HTTP 403 on direct fetch, and needing independent re-verification.
Entry pricing is competitive and well-corroborated at the smaller sizes ($39 for a $5K account) rising to $545 for a $100K account after the Jan 2025 price increase — broadly in line with the rest of the sector. Marked down specifically because the evaluation-fee refund on High Stakes is 70%, not the 100% a trader might reasonably assume from generic "fee refunded on first payout" marketing language repeated across third-party trackers — a real, quantifiable gap between marketing shorthand and the actual condition-laden mechanic, alongside profit split starting as low as 50% on the Hyper Growth entry tier before scaling up.
Reasonably broad tolerance: EAs are allowed broadly on MT4/MT5, and overnight/weekend holding is permitted (the firm is explicitly described as stricter on daily-loss controls than on holding patterns). Two real constraints stand out versus peers: EAs must be ones the trader fully owns and understands the source code of (closed-source/black-box EAs are a violation even though 'EAs allowed' is the headline), and copy trading is banned outright between any accounts — with no same-account-owner exception the way a comparable firm allows. 'Bracketing' pending orders around high-impact news is specifically banned, a narrower and more precisely-defined restriction than a blanket news-trading ban.
The5ers has changed pricing mid-cycle before (the Jan 2025 increase on 60K/100K High Stakes, announced directly rather than silently) and profit targets have shifted between a "Classic" (8%/5%) and current "New" (10%/5%) High Stakes structure per third-party trackers. No evidence found of a change being applied retroactively to accounts already funded under older terms — the changes found were forward-looking pricing/target updates on new purchases, not a clawback on existing funded accounts, which is the more serious version of this risk.
A 96% reply rate to negative Trustpilot reviews and no review-manipulation finding (unlike a peer firm reviewed on this site) put The5ers ahead of the sector norm on this dimension. It isn't scored higher because of a real, if only secondarily-sourced, pattern of account-termination disputes over large payouts where the stated reason ('account integrity and exclusive ownership issues') was reportedly not accompanied by specific trade evidence, and a reported risk-team review process that, in one account, declined a trader's request for an evidentiary chart walkthrough before finalizing a termination. Both rest on Forex Peace Army content that returned HTTP 403 on direct fetch — flagged for independent re-verification rather than treated as settled fact.
Member reviews are kept separate from our editorial assessment and from the provider score — they are moderated, not curated for tone.
No approved member reviews yet. An empty review list is not a negative signal — it means nobody has published one here.
If a field is missing here, treat it as unverified rather than as a negative.
Editor note: Prop firm — regulatory status intentionally not a scoring dimension (matches PROP_DIMENSIONS in src/lib/scoring.ts and The5ers' own Terms, which explicitly disclaim being a broker-dealer or regulated financial institution — the platform is a simulated/fictitious-funds evaluation environment; see Source #4). Good primary coverage on programs/rules/prohibited-practices/entity info (Sources #1, #4, #5, plus the official Jan-2025 price-change statement, Source #3) fetched directly from the5ers.com and the company's own X account. Two areas rest on secondary corroboration only, flagged explicitly rather than asserted as settled: (a) exact current per-size pricing and account-size lineup — the live High Stakes page returned an internally inconsistent pricing table on automated fetch, so the Jan-2025 official price notice was used as the anchor instead, with the discrepancy noted rather than silently resolved; (b) payout-dispute complaint patterns and the exact refund/withdrawal mechanics, since both help.the5ers.com pages 404'd and the Forex Peace Army review page 403'd on direct fetch — re-check all of these when the primary pages become accessible. The Feb 2024 US-CFD-trader suspension (Source #7) is press-corroborated and dated, but no confirmation of it being lifted was found, so its current 2026 status should be treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed resolved. The referral link's `?afmc=` tracking parameter and the supplied checkout coupon code match The5ers' documented in-house Affiliate Hub mechanic generically, but the specific commission rate for this program was not independently verified from a primary page.